Yesterday in Colorado, Kobe Bryant had the second half of his preliminary court appearance for the sexual assault charges he has been charged with, and there were some pretty major revelations in this preliminary hearing, almost all of them in Kobe's favor. For those who hadn't been following this case, let me sum up what came out in favor of Kobe:
First, it was discovered that there was almost no bruising on the alleged victim on or around her neck, and Bryant had no marks on him at all as you can see by this quote from this article:
Bryant had no marks on him when he underwent an exam on July 1st and his accuser had just a tiny bruise on her chin -- a bruise the lead detective in the case didn't even see while interviewing her. Moreover, even though prosecutors say Bryant held the woman by the neck during their encounter she apparently had no bruises on her neck.
Second, it was disclosed that the person accusing Kobe had sex with an ex-boyfriend two days before the alleged rape, as you can see in this quote from this article:
she had consensual sex with another man on June 28 and used a condom, backing earlier defense suggestions she was sexually active before her encounter with Bryant.
Third, it was discovered that a person who worked with the woman accusing Kobe who talked with her after the alleged rape and who had her count out the cash register said she did not look upset at all, as you can see by this quote from this article here:
She says she does not believe that the alleged victim was assaulted; that the young woman did not look or act as though there had been any problem. In fact, the auditor told investigators that the young woman finished counting out her money drawer before leaving.
Fourth, (and these next two are the real big "bombshells" Kobe's defense team dropped) it was discovered that the accuser not only had semen from someone other than Kobe in her panties when they did the rape test on her (and keep in mind, as noted above, the sex she had with her ex involved a condom), but they also discovered pubic hairs from a caucasian person other than the alleged victim, meaning they could not have come from Kobe; as you can see in this quote from this article:
the underwear the woman wore during a hospital examination July 1 contained sperm and semen from someone other than Bryant. Pubic hair samples from the woman also turned up hairs from a white person that could not have come from Bryant
Finally, in what is probably the most damaging testimony for the prosecution's case, the lead detective investigating the case, Eagle County Sheriff's Det. Doug Winters, not only said that the accuser did not tell Kobe "no" at any time, but that when she resisted, Kobe stopped, as you can see in this exchange from this article:
Winters said that the woman never told Bryant "no" during five minutes of sexual intercourse in an Edwards, Colo., hotel room June 30. When the woman resisted, Bryant stopped, Winters said.
When she moved his hand away, he stopped," Mackey said.
"Yes," replied Winters.
"There is no dispute he stopped," Mackey said.
"Correct," Winters said.
All of this adds up to the following: according to the accuser's story, she stayed late after to work to meet privately with Kobe, then once she was alone with him she consented to making out and pulled some articles of clothing aside to show Kobe a tatoo, but then said that he bent her over a chair by holding her by the neck and raped her, while not allowing her to leave the room through the door she came in. However, there were no marks on her consistent with this, and the minimal amount of vaginal trauma that was found was concluded to be something that she could have incurred during sex with one or two other people in the days leading up to her meeting with Kobe. She apparently never told Kobe "no" and when she resisted, Kobe stopped. After leaving Kobe's room, her co-worker says she did not seem distressed at all. Then she showed up to be examined for evidence of rape and had semen and pubic hairs of someone other than Kobe in her panties. Really, as this quote below from this article shows, it's questionable whether there is enough evidence for this case to even go to trial, but even if it does, it is looking like they have a very weak case against Kobe:
the common sense angle to all this doesn't seem to help prosecutors. Why didn't the young woman lash out more at Bryant during the assault? Why didn't she immediately tell the night auditor about what happened? Why didn't the guests in the hotel room just above Bryant's hear anything that night even though their windows were open? Why didn't the alleged victim try to leave through the two other doors in Bryant's room -- the sliding doors to a ground-level patio? Is it possible that the young woman had sex with someone else just after the Bryant incident? If so, what does that say about her state of mind? If not, how did that other man's semen get into her underwear? Some of these questions likely will be answered to the district attorney's satisfaction at trial. But all of them? Not likely.