Ok, this will be pretty to the point. I saw "The Two Towers" tonight at a press screening in Westwood, so this will be my review. Because I hate it when people see a movie before me and either overhype it or trash it, thus ruining my attempts at having as clean a slate as possible, I will not go into huge praise or complaints. I'll give a more complete review next week when 1) I've had a week to digest this viewing, 2) I see it for a second time, and 3) everyone else has a chance to go see it right away. My review is going to be based on the assumption that you've seen the trailer, and will probably be geared for people who (like me) read the book and are film fans. Ok, enough disclaimers.
In short, I really liked it, just like I knew I would. I would guess if you liked the first Lord of the Rings film, you'll like the second one; although they are fairly different films. Because of that, even if you didn't like the first one (and I haven't met anyone who really disliked it) you should give the second one a chance. My concerns going in were what Gollum would look like, and what Treebeard would look like, because both are purely CG characters (computer generated, for those who don't know what CG means). I was also worried about the prevalence of Liv Tyler in the trailers, because in the book, her character is really non-existant almost throughout all 3 parts, and I was worried they'd try to make it into a love story, when really it wasn't in the book. Finally I was worried just that they'd take huge liberties with the story and change things dramatically or something like that.
As to my first concern, Gollum and Treebeard looked pretty good. I would even go so far as to say Gollum looked great, definitely the best CG character I've ever seen in a movie. Its the first time I've seen a CG character that really did look like a real living creature, even if there were some points here and there that Gollum didn't look totally lifelike. Overall, they exceeded my expectations with him. With Treebeard I was really just most curious to see what actual shape he was going to take. For those who have read the book, you know what I'm talking about, for those who haven't, I won't say any more. Overall though, the effects looked really good, better than the first one even, although the Balrog from the first one still stands, in my opinion, as the best effect so far.
As to my second concern, about Liv Tyler being in the movie a lot because she was all over the preview, I had nothing to worry about. She was in this movie less than the first one, and in that one she was hardly in it at all. They did not turn it into a love story, at least they haven't yet. The stuff having to do with her (or any women in the film) is not there to "satisfy the female audience members" or whatever. The women are basically filling the same roles as they did in the book, so once again if you've read the book, you'll know what that means, if not, you'll have to see the movie.
My third concern, about them taking too many liberties with the story, or leaving things out, making things up or what have you, once again they did a great job. As with the first one, the story is not necessarily told in the same order as it was in the book, but all the same stuff happens by the time its all done. This one they may have stopped just short of where The Two Towers stopped in the book, but its ok because it was a good stopping point, and they'll get to that stuff in the next movie.
One thing about this film was that the pacing was vastly different than the first film was. The first one takes a bit to get going, picks up the pace for a short point in the middle, then kind of ends a little slower paced again (just like the book). In this one, they just don't have time to take it that slow, because there is so much going on. I remember thinking that same thing while reading the book though, just being amazed at how large the story was, and how much happens, and that comes across very well in the film. Another thing from the book that I thought came across very well was the feeling you have by the end of the second one how far they have come as characters. They are all clearly very affected by what is going on, and its even hard to picture how they were at the beginning of part one after all they've been through (this is especially true of Merry and Pippin). The other main difference between the first one and the second one is the overall tone of the film. You really get a feeling of the desperation they are all up against, and that wasn't there as much in the first one (or really hardly at all). In the first one I felt watching them that they were all these fairly invincible people who didn't get down about the task set before them. In this one, you really feel that what they're attempting is an extreme long-shot, and they have zero room for error if they want to succeed (and even then, they need a lot of lucky breaks).
Ok, the big question I guess is did I like it more or less than the first one. That's tough to say. I've seen the first one I think 5 or 6 times at this point, including having seen the extended cut. This one I've only seen once, so I don't know it as well. I think next week I'll have a better feel for whether I liked it more or less than the first one, but it did seem that in general the people there liked the new one better. It did make me somewhat emotional in parts, as the first one did, and I did get very pumped up at points. Even if I didn't like it as much as the first one (and I don't know on that one, as I said), it was certainly close enough. I reccomend it :-)
Ok, here's some pics from the screening tonight, enjoy:
Click for Pics