Ok, I've been meaning to make this entry for the past couple days, but I haven't really had the time. I saw the movie "Bowling for Columbine" the other day, and thought it was a really great film. For those of you who have not heard of it, it is a documentary by Michael Moore, who is probably best known for his film "Roger and Me". "Bowling for Columbine" is essentially a look into why America has so many handgun-related deaths each year. It examines our country and compares it to other countries and tries to come up with some reason why Americans seem to be so violent, and so prone to killing each other with handguns. It explores various popular theories on the subject, such as "we have so many guns", "we have a history of violence", "we have mixed ethnicities", "our entertainment is violent", etc... Michael Moore goes through each of these issues and basically debunks them by pointing out other countries with either greater histories of violence, more guns, more violent video games or whatever, and shows that in these countries they don't come close to the number of handgun homicides that we have each year here in America. Essentially what he points to is the way our culture and mainly our media promotes fear in this country. Watching the news, for instance, you'll notice that everything has a slant on it like we are in danger of something, whether its nuclear war, anthrax, shark attacks, killer bees, snakes, the taliban, black people, or whatever. Its all about keeping us riveted to the TV by making us afraid. Even the way products are marketed towards us is based on fear: "without our product, people won't like you, you won't find a girlfriend, you won't be cool" etc... I think he makes some very good points there. He does also point to bad government programs, big businesses and the NRA as contributing. The film is alternately enlightening, amusing, horrifying and disturbing, but is definitely worth seeing.
I had only one thing to really add to it that I thought he may have overlooked, and I'd be curious if anyone else agrees with me on this. Ask yourself this question: What is the most famous murder that you can think of that was not committed on American soil? Ok, now exclude wars, or terrorist acts or acts by some dictator which result in the deaths of hundreds of people. I'm talking about regular homicides, where one person kills another person by their own hand, not with a bomb or a plane or an army or something. And also, I mean murder, not some accidental death like the way Princess Di was killed. This murder, could have been committed by an American if you want to, just as long as it did not take place here in America. Can you think of one? Cause I'll be honest, I've been thinking about it for a couple days and I'm having trouble coming up with one. Jack the Ripper maybe? Ok, now think about what is the most famous murder in America? For me, there's a couple to choose from without having to think too hard: President Kennedy, the OJ thing, Columbine, the mother who killed her kids, the sniper, etc...
I want to venture a theory about the violence in this country, and see what people think. Do you think its possible that we have so many homicides and violent crimes here in America because people who commit these acts get so much media attention? I'm not saying that its because movies and TV shows or video games or whatever glamorize violence and make people want to be violent. I'm saying, is it because the people who actually DO these things get so much media coverage? Clearly someone who kills a bunch of people is not going to be guaranteed to be as famous as the Kennedy assasination or OJ, but they will get SOME coverage, almost guaranteed. And the more disturbing the crime, the more coverage they'll get. I remember a couple years ago, there was this white kid from Orange County who raped and murdered like an 8 year old black girl in Vegas or something, and that got a lot of coverage out here, mainly because it was so disturbing in so many ways: racism, pedophilia, murder, etc... Not everyone is so depraved as to resort to doing things like that to get on TV, but is it so farfetched to think that SOME people would? So much is being made out of being famous these days (and has been for decades), and so many people achieve fame for being violent, is it so unreasonable to think that some people just want to be noticed, and will do ANYTHING, even killing people, to get that attention? For me, if you want to blame anything for why we have such violence here in America, that's as good a reason as any. What do you think?